[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] templates: use hardlink detection in rsync
Dwight Engen
dwight.engen at oracle.com
Mon Dec 3 17:40:42 UTC 2012
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:47:26 -0600
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.engen at oracle.com):
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:04:13 -0600
> > Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > > However one question is: is -H ubiquitous?
> >
> > I'm wondering why we don't just use the cp -a? It seems like cp is
> > far more likely to be installed than rsync? rootfs_path probably
> > doesn't already exist so it not like rsync is going to be faster?
>
> The one advantage to me was that 'rsync -va /x/ /y' does the right
> thing whether or not /y already exists or not. cp -a does not. This
> just left the code tidier.
>
> Is there a nicer clean one-line idiom to do that with cp?
I think cp -aT does what we want. You might want to add -u also.
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list