[lxc-devel] summary of the latest discussions and pending patchset

Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano at free.fr
Tue Mar 2 15:42:24 UTC 2010


Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at free.fr> wrote:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A little summary of what was talked about and what is pending:
>>
>> [... snip ...]
>>
>> * Statically link the executable
>>
>> Ciprian Dorin sent a patchset in order to generate a static library and
>> link against it.
>> That was a wish of Michael T Johnson of Foresight Linux.
>> I will take the patchset.
>>
>> [... snip ...]
>>     
>
>
>     Hy Daniel!
>
>     A few months ago I've sent a patch that allows the user to
> configure and build a static version of all our binaries. We've
> exchanged a few emails about the subject (the date was after the quote
> above). But then the subject was dropped.
>
>     Could I reiterate the proposal? Is there something wrong with my
> approach? Should I do it in some other (better) way?
>
>     If interested my repository is at the following URL (the diff with
> the current master is at the end of the email):
>     git://gitorious.org/~ciprian.craciun/lxc/ciprian-craciun-patches.git
>
>     Thanks,
>     Ciprian.
>
>     P.S.: I've also created a "mainline" mirror of LXC repository on Gitorious:
>     http://gitorious.org/lxc/mainline
>
>     If someone wants ownership to this repository please tell me.
> (I've created it because there will be users (like myself) that would
> like to "fork" it from there, and thus we could see which are
> potential developers to LXC.)
>
>     My `static-build` diff to current master:
>   

Yep, the first problem with the log category was solved by Cedric but 
then I forgot to take your patch. Will look at it thanks.





More information about the lxc-devel mailing list