<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 12-09-18 10:51, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG1y0sePQjiCcWu=eO+UvpPNzEbFQidiA9wATy-jUk6ocBCvPg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Kees
Bakker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:keesb@ghs.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">keesb@ghs.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">On 11-09-18 21:56, Andrey Repin wrote:<br>
> Greetings, Kees Bakker!<br>
><br>
>> ii lxc-common 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2
amd64 Linux Containers userspace tools (common
tools)<br>
>> ii lxcfs 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2
amd64 FUSE based filesystem for LXC<br>
>> ii lxd 2.0.11-0ubuntu1~16.04.4
amd64 Container hypervisor based on LXC - daemon<br>
>> ii lxd-client 2.0.11-0ubuntu1~16.04.4
amd64 Container hypervisor based on LXC - client<br>
> Upgrade from PPA.<br>
> add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable<br>
><br>
> ii lxc-common 2.1.1-0ubuntu1 amd64
Linux Containers userspace tools (common t<br>
> ii lxc-templates 2.1.1-0ubuntu1 amd64
Linux Containers userspace tools (template<br>
> ii lxc1 2.1.1-0ubuntu1 amd64
Linux Containers userspace tools<br>
> ii lxcfs 2.0.8-1ubuntu2 amd64
FUSE based filesystem for LXC<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Hmm. That PPA does not have liblxc1 2.1.1, but
3.0.1<br>
<br>
# apt list --upgradable<br>
Listing... Done<br>
liblxc1/xenial 3.0.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.2~<wbr>ubuntu16.04.1~ppa1
amd64 [upgradable from: 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]<br>
libseccomp2/xenial 2.3.1-2.1ubuntu3~ubuntu16.04.<wbr>1~ppa1
amd64 [upgradable from: 2.3.1-2.1ubuntu2~16.04.1]<br>
lxc-common/xenial 2.1.1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1~<wbr>ppa1
amd64 [upgradable from: 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]<br>
lxcfs/xenial 3.0.1-0ubuntu2~18.04.1~<wbr>ubuntu16.04.1~ppa1
amd64 [upgradable from: 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]<br>
<br>
# apt policy liblxc1<br>
liblxc1:<br>
Installed: 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2<br>
Candidate: 3.0.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.2~<wbr>ubuntu16.04.1~ppa1<br>
Version table:<br>
3.0.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.2~<wbr>ubuntu16.04.1~ppa1 500<br>
500 <a
href="http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-lxc/stable/ubuntu"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://ppa.launchpad.net/<wbr>ubuntu-lxc/stable/ubuntu</a>
xenial/main amd64 Packages<br>
3.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 100<br>
100 <a href="http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/<wbr>ubuntu</a>
xenial-backports/main amd64 Packages<br>
*** 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 500<br>
500 <a href="http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/<wbr>ubuntu</a>
xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages<br>
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status<br>
2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 500<br>
500 <a href="http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://security.ubuntu.com/<wbr>ubuntu</a>
xenial-security/main amd64 Packages<br>
2.0.0-0ubuntu2 500<br>
500 <a href="http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/<wbr>ubuntu</a>
xenial/main amd64 Packages<br>
<br>
I could upgrade to the 3.0 packages, but that would be
more challenging.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2.1 is not 'LTS' version, so it's expected that it
won't be available anymore. Personally I'd upgrade to 3.0.
But backup /var/lib/lxd (when ALL containers are stopped)
beforehand.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Upgrading to 3.0 gives me two options: 1) xenial-backports, 2) the
suggested PPA (ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable).<br>
Which one would you pick?<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG1y0sePQjiCcWu=eO+UvpPNzEbFQidiA9wATy-jUk6ocBCvPg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>FWIW, I'm more inclined to think your 'kworker' issue
might be related to btrfs instead of lxd, but it might be
harder to debug that.</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
OK, I'll keep that in mind.<br>
-- <br>
Kees<br>
</body>
</html>