<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">The ideal architecture right now is, Ubuntu 14.04 on the server and Centos 7 or Fedora 20 LXC containers. I am even getting rid of Vmware Vsphere altogether, since I feel everything twice as fast.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Peter Steele <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pwsteele@gmail.com" target="_blank">pwsteele@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
On 12/02/2015 08:54 AM, Peter Steele wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
On 12/02/2015 08:09 AM, Saint Michael wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I could not
find on Google any mention of Red Hat killing LXC on
Libvirt. Care to elaborate?<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
Here's the first reference I came across a few months ago: <a href="https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153" target="_blank">https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153</a>.
There's no date indicated here so I really don't know what this
means, but I just did another search to see if I could find some
more information. I came across this thread:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00026.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00026.html</a><br>
<br>
This was a fairly recent thread and I'd not found this before. If
you read through the follow-ups apparently libvirt-lxc is *not*
being deprecated:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00030.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00030.html</a><br>
<br>
So, it appears I was mistaken. I'm not sure where that leaves me
though. One issue we've had with libvirt-lxc is that although it's
a great product there seems to be very little activity with the
project. My own posts to the libvirt-lxc mailing list often go
unanswered, whereas this mailing list (by comparison) is great.
Posts to more generic forums are more often than not to find
information related to LXC and not libvirt-lxc. The community for
libvirt-lxc just doesn't seem that large.<br>
<br>
Looks like I have some thinking to do...<br>
</blockquote></span>
Actually, I guess what this means is just that Redhat is deprecating
it, but the libvirt-lxc project as a whole is still moving forward
for whatever distros want to include it, so we probably could still
use it as a non-Redhat supported package. But, I think we'll
continue with our move to LXC since it does seem to have a lot of
momentum going for it. I think it's the right direction to move for
the long term.<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
lxc-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org">lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>