<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 12/02/2015 08:09 AM, Saint Michael wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAC9cSODEoQTuhJkerebiE5zUJ7jq80-GDd__GhCcNtEz3sSLKA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I could not
find on Google any mention of Red Hat killing LXC on Libvirt.
Care to elaborate?<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
Here's the first reference I came across a few months ago:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153">https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153</a>. There's no date
indicated here so I really don't know what this means, but I just
did another search to see if I could find some more information. I
came across this thread:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00026.html">https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00026.html</a><br>
<br>
This was a fairly recent thread and I'd not found this before. If
you read through the follow-ups apparently libvirt-lxc is *not*
being deprecated:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00030.html">https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-August/msg00030.html</a><br>
<br>
So, it appears I was mistaken. I'm not sure where that leaves me
though. One issue we've had with libvirt-lxc is that although it's a
great product there seems to be very little activity with the
project. My own posts to the libvirt-lxc mailing list often go
unanswered, whereas this mailing list (by comparison) is great.
Posts to more generic forums are more often than not to find
information related to LXC and not libvirt-lxc. The community for
libvirt-lxc just doesn't seem that large.<br>
<br>
Looks like I have some thinking to do...<br>
<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>