<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"><html>
<head>
<meta name="Generator" content="Zarafa WebApp v7.0.7-34256">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>RE: [Lxc-users] lxc-destroy erase rootfs</title>
</head>
<body>
Sorry to hear you b0rked your setup. Are you perhaps a Xen user who found out that `'xm destroy` != lxc-destroy?<br><br>If so, you're probably not the first....<br><br><br><br><div><font face="Arial, sans-serif">Regards,</font></div><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; "><div style="font-weight: bold; "><b style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; "><br></b></div>Roland Neary</span><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><b><br></b></font><p></p><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #325FBA; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">-----Original message-----<br><strong>From:</strong> Papp Tamas <tompos@martos.bme.hu><br><strong>Sent:</strong> Thu 07-Feb-2013 23:49<br><strong>To:</strong> Christoph Willing <cwilling@users.sourceforge.net>; lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Re: [Lxc-users] lxc-destroy erase rootfs<br><br><pre style="white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;" wrap="">On 02/07/2013 11:42 PM, Christoph Willing wrote:<br>><br>><br>> On 08/02/2013, at 8:37 AM, Papp Tamas <<a href="mailto:tompos@martos.bme.hu">tompos@martos.bme.hu</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> hi All,<br>>><br>>> Actually there was already a topic about this, but I don't really remember the result, because with<br>>> lxc v0.7 the rootfs was removed only if it existed in /var/lib/lxc .<br>>><br>>> If I use v0.9 it's removed anyway during the lxc-destroy process. Why is that?<br>>><br>>><br>>> First I think it would be a great idea if before the remove step there would be !!! RED ALERT !!!,<br>>> which can warn the user, what it does, as it works differently than in the version before.<br>>> This is quite dagerous this way.<br>>><br>>><br>>> Second, I suggest a to make it a non-default behaviour, like:<br>>><br>>> lxc-destroy [-r|--remove] -n container<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Actually why does it remove the rootfs? What would be the appropriate way to modify a container<br>>> configuration if not 'modify config -> lxc-destroy -> lxc-start'?<br>><br>> How about:<br>> lxc-stop -> modify config -> lxc-start<br><br>It would be even simpler.<br>Anything just do not erase data:)<br><br>tamas<br><br><br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer<br>Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 <br>and get the hardware for free! Learn more.<br><a href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb" target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Lxc-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net">Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users</a><br></pre></blockquote>
</body>
</html>