[lxc-devel] question about /sys/fs/cgroup/cgmanager
Dietmar Maurer
dietmar at proxmox.com
Sat Nov 7 08:32:45 UTC 2015
> The reason we did it this way instead of just binding in the sock itself is
> because if cgmanager restarts, this allows all containers to continue and
> just pick up the new socket. Binding in the socket itself would make
> umount+rm in the container innocuous, but a cgmanager restart would be
> problematic in the container.
Thanks for the details.
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list