[lxc-devel] Recomended Kernel Version LT vs ML
Serge Hallyn
serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Wed Jan 9 16:23:27 UTC 2013
Quoting Leon Waldman (le.waldman at gmail.com):
> Sorry for repost it here, but looks like the lxc-user list doesn't have
> the same rate of view :P
>
> Hi,
>
>
> We are planning to deploy LXC in production using CentOS 6.3.
>
> The problem is that it ships with kernel 2.6.32-279 per default, and
> AFAIK this is a not recommended version to use with LXC.
>
> Now, the issue is... The kernel Long Term version from EPEL is the 3.0
> version... the Main Line is currently on 3.7 but it's changing the major
> version every 6 weeks.
>
>
> It would worth the testing overhead of keeping changing the kernel major
> version every 6 weeks to have a bigger then 3.0 running or the 3.0
> version is enough feature complete to use on a production environment?
With 3.0, I think you'll only miss user namespaces (not 100% complete
anyway) and the very latest setns stuff which just hit 3.8.
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list