[lxc-devel] [PATCH] lxc_cgroup_append_task_1of3() helper_1of2

[Greg Kurz]

On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 14:29 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 02:59 PM, "Axel Schöner" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the new patchset consists of 3 patches:
> > patch_1of3_lxc_cgroup_append_task_helper_cgroup
> > patch_2of3_lxc_cgroup_append_task_helper_namespace
> > patch_3of3_lxc_cgroup_append_task_in_lxc_attach
> >
> > I hope it is much better now.
> > Thanks to Greg
> 
> Axel,
> 
> can you please resend your patchset ? They don't apply to the tree.
> 
> Also, I am wondering if we really want to do that because the caller of 
> the lxc-attach is supposed to be at least the administrator of the 
> container, so do we really want to apply the restrictions to it ?
> 

I had a similar thought... but on the other hand, some people (like Axel
I guess) use lxc-attach to add a new workflow to the container and
expect container limitations to apply... Should we let the caller decide
with a new argument to lxc-attach ?

-- 
Gregory Kurz                                     gkurz at fr.ibm.com
Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys                  http://www.ibm.com
Tel +33 (0)534 638 479                           Fax +33 (0)561 400 420

"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
        Alan Moore.